本帖最后由 新葉 于 2020-1-14 19:05 編輯
古今平仄新論
羅志海 / 文
一、古音平仄
現(xiàn)代閩南話是古代唐朝話的子方言。現(xiàn)代潮汕話和現(xiàn)代海陸豐話是現(xiàn)代閩南話的子方言、是古代唐朝話的孫方言。這些子孫方言,它們的陰平調(diào)調(diào)值是33調(diào)值(有些方言異讀為44調(diào)值),發(fā)音特點(diǎn)是,起點(diǎn)3,落點(diǎn)也是3。陽平調(diào)調(diào)值是55調(diào)值,發(fā)音特點(diǎn)是,起點(diǎn)5,落點(diǎn)也是5。平調(diào)讀音平緩。由此可見,古代唐朝話陰平調(diào)調(diào)值是33調(diào)值,陽平調(diào)調(diào)值是55調(diào)值,這是毋庸置疑的。 這些子孫方言的仄調(diào)呢?它們的仄調(diào)有的是降調(diào),如51調(diào),發(fā)音特點(diǎn)是,起點(diǎn)5,落點(diǎn)是1;有的是升調(diào),如35調(diào),發(fā)音特點(diǎn)是,起點(diǎn)3,落點(diǎn)是5;有的或是降升調(diào),如212調(diào),發(fā)音特點(diǎn)是,先由2降至1,然后再升上2。仄調(diào)讀音不平緩。溯源后,古代唐朝話仄調(diào)應(yīng)有相同的特點(diǎn),這是不會(huì)錯(cuò)的。 這些子孫方言的入調(diào)呢?它們的調(diào)值一般為2.和5.,有起點(diǎn),沒有落點(diǎn)。讀音促狹逼仄。同樣地,古代唐朝話入調(diào)應(yīng)有相同的特點(diǎn),這是不會(huì)錯(cuò)的。韻書字典通常把入調(diào)列為仄聲調(diào)。
二、今音平仄
古代唐朝話有陰平、陽平、陰上、陽上、陰去、陽去、陰入、陽入八個(gè)調(diào)類,F(xiàn)代普通話有陰平、陽平、上聲、去聲四個(gè)調(diào)類。 表面看起來,現(xiàn)代普通話陰平陽平是平調(diào),上聲去聲是仄調(diào)。實(shí)質(zhì)上并不是,F(xiàn)代普通話陰平55調(diào)值,是真正的平調(diào)。而陽平調(diào)呢?陽平調(diào)調(diào)值是35調(diào)。很明顯,陽平調(diào)是仄調(diào)而不是平調(diào)。陽平調(diào)是名存實(shí)亡的平調(diào)。
三、結(jié)論
綜上所述,古音平仄是真正的平仄,名符其實(shí)。今音平仄不是真正的平仄,名存實(shí)亡。 看了這篇帖文后,親愛的文人騷客們,你們做何感想?你們的平仄理論會(huì)不會(huì)有所觸動(dòng)修改?
A New Theory Of Ancient And Modern Level And Oblique Tones
by Luo Zhihai
1、 Ancient level and oblique tones
Modern Minnan dialect is a son-dialectof ancient Tang Dynasty dialect. Modern Chaoshan dialect and modern Hailufengdialect are the son-dialects of modern Minnan dialect and the grandson-dialectsof ancient Tang Dynasty dialect. Their Yin level tonal value is 33 (value of somedialects is 44) and their pronunciation feature is starting point 3 and endingpoint 3. Their Yang level tonal value is 55 and their pronunciation feature is startingpoint 5 and ending point 5. The level tones are flat. Thus it can be seen thatin the ancient Tang Dynasty, the Yin level tonal value was 33 and the Yanglevel tonal value was 55, which is beyond doubt. What about theobliquetones of these son-dialect andgrandson-dialects? Some of their tonal tones are descending tones, such as 51, itspronunciation feature is starting point 5 and ending point 1; some areascending tones, such as 35, its pronunciation feature is starting point 3 and endingpoint 5; some are descending and ascending tones, such as 212, its pronunciationfeature is starting point 2 to 1 and then ascending to 2. the oblique tones isnot smooth. After tracing back to the source, it is not wrong that the oblique tonesof ancient Tang Dynasty should have the same features. What about therutones of these son-dialect andgrandson-dialects? Their tonal values are generally 2. And 5., with a startingpoint and no ending point. The pronunciation is narrow. In the same way, it isnot wrong that therutones of the dialect of ancient Tang Dynasty should have the samefeatures. The dictionaries of rhymes usually lists therutones as theobliquetones.
2、Modern level and oblique tones
In ancient Tang Dynasty, therewere eight kinds of tones: Yin Ping, Yang Ping, Yin Shang, Yang Shang, Yin Qu,Yang Qu, Yin Ru and Yang Ru. Modern Putonghua has four tones: Yin Ping, YangPing, Shangsheng and Qusheng. On the surface, in modernPutonghua, Yin Ping and Yang Ping are level tones and Shangsheng and Qushengare obliquetones. Notreally. In modern Putonghua, 55 tonal value of Yin Ping, which is the real leveltone. And Yang Ping tone? Yang Ping tonal value is 35. It is clear that theYang Ping tone is an obliquetones rather than a level tone. Yang Ping tone is a level tone,but ceases to exist except in name.
3、Conclusion
To sum up, the ancient leveland oblique tones are the true tones, which are worthy of their names. Today's leveland oblique tones are not the true level tones. Their names are still inexistence, which are cease to exist except in name. After reading this internetarticle, dear literati and poets, what do you think? Will your theory of level andoblique tones be touched and modified?
北京時(shí)間1/7/2020寫 Beijing Time 1/7/2020 wrote
|